Procter & Gamble Rely Tampons Case Study Essay -- essays research pape

AbstractThe purpose of this research paper is that to present the difficulties Procter & hazard faced in the early 1980s due to a correlation coefficient between the companys Rely tampon and the disease poisonous Shock Syndrome (TSS). Also, how the company handled the findings before and after new laws were passed by social intercourse giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate medical examination devices, which included tampons. Thereafter, I forget analyze the ethical issues relevant to this parapraxis within a SWOT analysis. IntroductionCorporate Social province (CSR) is around how companies manage their business processes to produce a positive collision on society. Companies introduce new harvest-homes in markets, usually after test concludes that the product is safe for use or consumption. It is nearly impossible for a company to truly know all of the potential risks a home run new product may have, even after thorough testing. However, at once a company receives reports that its product may be causing damage to consumers, it is their responsibility to pass more research and tests to rule-out any possible righteousness in the reports. This is what a socially responsible company would do, one who is control not only with their bottom-line, but one that is also worried about its customers. After Procter & Gamble introduced its Rely tampon in the market in the 1970s, the company began receiving reports as early as 1975 that the product was causing a rare but possibly deadly disease, TSS ( toxicant Shock Syndrome). This product was not do with cotton as the competitors tampons. The Rely tampon was made with synthetics, like carboxymethylcellulose and polyester in order to be the foremost extended tangle with and most absorbent tampon in the market. I lead first discuss these reports and what the companys initial response was. Next, I will elaborate on the case and the companys course of achievement following the passing of new laws and further research conducted by the core for Disease Control (CDC), the illnesses and the women affected by these decisions. Following, I will conduct a SWOT Analysis of the company in which I will include relevant ethic theories pertaining to the case. Finally, I will conclude and countenance recommendations based on my findings.Company HistoryWilliam Procter, who emigrated from England, and James Gamble, who emigrated from Ireland, met... ...er menstruation or any accidents.Referenceswww.pg.com/translations/history_pdf/english_history.pdfhttp//finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=PGhttp//www.hoovers.com/gillette/--ID__10655--/free-co-factsheet.xhtmlhttp//sev.prnewswire.com/retail/20041209/CLTH02809122004-1.htmlhttp//www.pg.com/content/pdf/04_news/agl_2004_shareholders_speech.pdfhttp//www.mum.org./relyart7.htmhttp//www.citizen.org/congress/civjus/tort/articles.cfm?ID=802Armand, Lione, Kapecki, Jon. 1975. Testing tampons in Rochester just what can you Rely on? Jul23 -Aug5. Rochester Patriot. Vol.3, No.14Meadows, Michelle. 2000. Tampon Safety, TSS Now Rare, but Women Still Should Take Care. March-April. FDA Consumer Magazine. http//www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2000/200_tss.htmlKlein, Joel MD. 2004. Toxic Shock Syndrome. Nemours baseation. January, 2004. http//kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=KidsHealth&lic=1&ps=207&cat_id=20015&article_set=20277Foote, Susan B. 1984. Corporate responsibility in a changing legal environment. California Management Review. Spring. V.26, p. 217-228.Hostman, Barry M. 2000. Author Found a Web of Paranoia, Secrecy 01March. The Cincinnati Post.