Do Things Have to Be Scientifically Proven to Be True? Essay

Usually things do have to be scientifically proven to become veritable. For instance in a law suit in which the court is trying to desexualize if a certain man is a father of a baby, skillful as an example, a scientific process must take couch in which the DNA of the father and the baby are tested for similarities. indeed the truth ordain appear once the results from a genetic laboratory arrive. Another example is if they want to find the murderer of a evil and thither was blood of the murderer at the crime scene they could alike scientifically check if the true murderer is the same as the someone accused. Other than lawsuits, things besides have to be scientifically proven true to be current by the society. For instance global warming, if someone exclusively states that global warming is amongst us the fact that people are exhalation to find it true is very slim. However if that same person endorse his claim scientifically with evidence, such as stating that the Glaci ers are melting, plants and animals are organism take outd from their habitat, and the number of severe storms and droughts is increasing, then his claim would be accepted.However, in that location is the argument that people thought that their theories were the truth however now as more advancements in science are being made we establish that these theories are incorrect. For instance, in the late 1800s Joseph John Thomson perceived that an subdivision is a charged sphere with electrons inside, and according to his theory he came up with the plum cake model. At that time, his model was good enough to exempt many physical and chemical phenomena such as electrolysis and electron emission, and for that reason, it was accepted in the society. However, Ernest Rutherford with the microscope and radiation of alpha particles he was able to arise to a modernistic conclusion in which he came up with a new model known as the planetary model of the atom.There is also another perspective to scientific truth, that it can neer be succeed since there is no possibility that something is a hundred percent true, there are always exceptions to every territorial dominion. Also there is no attainable way to prove the existence of many things for instance gravity, however we think that the law of gravity is true yet there is no bring proof of its existence. Another example would be the rule that states that an object will move in a straight line unless a force acts on it to change that motion, there is no way to prove that rule since there will always be a force playacting on it whether it is the force of gravity, or even the gravitational pull among two objects. Nevertheless this rule is believed to be scientifically true. As Nicholas Alchin mentioned in his book Theory of Knowledge, This is the essence of scientific truth it can never be proven experimentally that it is correct, but it can be proved that it is wrong.