Kierkegaard and Sartre Essay

existentialist philosophy has been a influential philosophy since its inception in the 19th degree centigrade through the 20th century, especially after origination War II. Soren Kierkegaard was a Danish polymath and is regarded by m both as The nonplus of Existentialism. Kierkegaard was interested in subjectivity-the means people relate themselves to truths. He proposed that the truth was reliant on more that just objective facts. The importance, Kierkegaard reasoned, was the way a person relates to these objective facts.Kierkegaards views on the importance of the respective(prenominal) is emphasized in this paper. Kierkegaard values the individual above what he calls the unexclusive. The humanity is antithetical to the individual finding his or her self. The public is the prevalent views and opinions of the group. It is mob mentality. It is the antithesis of reasoned and cargonful consideration. The most disturbing aspect of the public is how it sublimely tries to substitu te an individuals thoughts and feelings with those of the publics.Kierkegaard implicates schools and philosophers in the destruction and subversion of the individual creating what he terms as skulker individuals. Kierkegaard concern is the loss of individual, which he values above all else. The uniqueness of the individual is what gives a community of individuals its strength. Sartre is a giant of 20th century philosophy and is known for his major contributions to existentialism and his active commitment to political causes.The Existentialism of Sartre believes that the answers to the risky questions regarding mankind, in every aspect, requires a new example of thought and consciousness beyond any and every category enter in the collective body of knowledge. Sartre does not reject science or psychology as failed intellectual disciplines, but he did believe that any of these disciplines was simply inadequate to explain our existence and the reasons we are here. Sartres Existentia lism is relevant to diversity because of the monumental task of creating an entirely new fashion model and a body of knowledge to fill it that is implied by its main tenets. plot of land Existentialism sees the need for whole new categories of thought, it does not reject or even discredit the current framework within which our categories of knowledge in short work. In these ideas, there is no rejection of the, as Sartre views them, inadequate categories of knowledge such as the sciences and philosophy. Sartre leaves the door unfastened to possibilities and makes no condemnation of the prevailing range of a function (the confidence in science, etc. to be able to answer the big philosophical questions without the need for a new framework of thought).This encourages new and versatile minds to explore some of these radical ideas without fear of ridicule or rejection. It is an open invitation for an open dialogue about an idea that will require the great diversity of minds possible if they are to become reality. because that is the only way to fit and create the framework of thought needed if we are ever to authentically understand the human condition. idea that entire new levels of thought are required for answers to deep philosophical questions.Kierkegaard emphasizes the importance of the individual discovering and recognizing their identity as a human and considers this quest a moral imperative. Taking this philosophical approach regarding ones individuality translates into a deeper respect for and sagacity of other persons. Diversity is not only tolerated, but it becomes a necessary part of every human interaction. This lays a foundation for our everyday tinct and associations with other humans that is inherently positive and loving and complements the teachings of Christianity such as unconditional love.